William F. Buckley, author, columnist, TV talk show host, and founding editor of National Review magazine, died today at age 82.
Buckley was one of the people most responsible for making the conservative movement a powerful force in the United States during the past six decades.
Especially through his influential magazine, Buckley set the agenda for the American right and made it appealing to a mass audience. His editorial approach and political philosophy combined to create an ecumenism on the right that allowed the various factions to work together, although the relationships have always been strained to some degree. However, his stolid opposition to statism in all of its forms provided a rallying cry for the American right and continues to do so.
Although his demeanor was anachronistically aristocratic, Buckley made conservatism less stuffy and more open to innovative thinking, often describing himself as a libertarian. In fact, he was probably a classical liberal at heart.
Many on the right see Buckley’s influence as having been ultimately deleterious in making way for neoconservatism, which they see as merely modern liberalism done incrementally—which is a fairly accurate assessment of that faction. The growth of a political and social movement, however, always involves some compromises and dilution, and the fact that the modern right has stumbled in recent years shows how important Buckley’s synthesizing role was in previous decades.
History will show that William F. Buckley was central in reviving conservatism and the American right from its awful post-World War II doldrums. The movement still lacks a standard-bearer of his stature.
Well said, Steve.–STK
Bill Buckley provided stark counterpoint to the pervasive modern liberal attitude that equates conservatism with reactionary ignorance and liberalism with profound enlightenment.
Thanks for your very thoughtful words, Nocomme. Buckley’s immensely personable nature really helped him make conservatism seem more humane and appealing to ordinary people, and that was clearly a manifestation of his real personality.–STK
It would be hard to overestimate his impact on my early political thinking. Without him and Reagan I don’t know if I’d be a conservative and if I weren’t a conservative I don’t know what I would be.
Since the news of his passing earlier today I’ve read a lot of stories like Dean’s, above, personal and really quite emotional. I can relate. I saw him twice in my life, once at Fordham U. when I was attending and once about ten years ago at a book signing. He was so completely as I expected him to be, I can’t help but smile just thinking of it now. He was witty, sly and so very bright.
I posted my feelings about him on my blog as well. I tried to do it without gushing like a schoolboy. I think I probably failed. LOL I will certainly miss him.
Very nice reminiscence, Dean. Thanks for sending it.–STK
S.T.,
I’ve posted my own thoughts on Buckley and recollected my one brief meeting with him.
Take a look at it, if you’d like, here:
http://deanabbott.typepad.com/notes_and_meditations/2008/02/losing-bill-buc.html
God bless WFB. He is without peer in academia. He effortlessly devoured leftists with good humor, keen intellect and plain old common sense. It doesn’t take much strategy to defeat a liberal; simply stick to the high road, keep the argument fact based, think outside of the Marxist box and refrain from being mean spirited. Mr. Buckley dumbfounded even the most indoctrinated (liberal educated) leftists with his superior, seemingly supernatural ability to send leftists to debate hell but at the same time having them looking forward to the journey there. He is the conservative standard bearer and his impact will resound in conservative victory after victory for ages to come. The planet just got considerably dumber. A temporary victory for liberalism, nee perversion.