April the 15th marked Holocaust Memorial Day. Nearly everyone knows about the industrial killing of six million Jews for no other reason than that they were Jews. “Serious historiography” of the subject has ensured that the Shoah, meaning Holocaust in Hebrew, is “consigned to posterity,” its lessons remembered and commemorated throughout the civilized world.
Although she failed to dignify the Armenian genocide of 1915, CNN’s Christiane Amanpour certainly covered the Holocaust and the killing fields of Cambodia, Bosnia, northern Iraq, Rwanda, and Darfur, for a 2008 documentary about genocide. In the interest of pacifying its Turkish allies, American officialdom has generally aped Amanpour, refusing to implicate the Ottomans in the mass murder of up to 1.5 million Armenians, 100 years ago.
This month, Kim Kardashian and Pope Francis, in order of importance, remedied Amanpour’s Armenian “omission.” The Pontiff called the massacre “the first genocide of the 20th century.” The Armenian-American reality TV star, her posterior, and the rest of her entourage, visited the Genocide Memorial in Yerevan, Armenia, to pay their respects.
There is no philosopher of Hannah Arendt’s caliber today to give dignity to the victims of the Stalin-like systematic starvation of the Boers by the British during the Second Boer War. Fifteen percent of the Afrikaner population was rounded up, interned, and starved to death–27,000 women and children. The image of young Lizzie van Zyl, who died in the Bloemfontein concentration camp, ought to be engraved in popular memory. It is not! When she died, Lizzie looked like the Jewish bags of bones who perished in the Nazi death and concentration camps.
Mention of Hannah Arendt is a must, as this remarkable Jewish philosopher illustrated the similarities between “our century’s two totalitarianisms,” the Nazis and the Soviets. Arendt’s “Origins of Totalitarianism” spoke to a truth unmentioned until the publication of “The Black Book of Communism”: both “systems massacred their victims not for what they did (such as resisting the regime) but for who they were, whether Jews or kulaks.”
If anything, “The Black Book” treads too lightly in its qualitative comparisons between Nazism and the “Marxist-Leninist phenomenon.” On the quantitative front, “Nazism, at an estimated 25 million,” turned out to be distinctly less murderous than Communism, whose “grand total of victims [is] variously estimated at between 85 million and 100 million murdered … the most colossal case of political carnage in history.”
Qualitatively, the “‘class genocide’ of Communism” is certainly comparable to the “‘race genocide’ of Nazism.” In its reach and methods, moreover, nothing compares to Communism’s continual, ongoing invention of new classes of “enemies of the people” to liquidate: “Mass violence against the population was a deliberate policy of the new revolutionary order; and its scope and inhumanity far exceeded anything in the national past.”
The fact that socialists and communists are still voted into power—with swagger in Greece—demonstrates that communists, despite their murderous past, are still seen as belonging to the camp of democratic progress, whereas the Right is forever subjected to unfounded suspicions of unforgiven fascist and Nazi sympathies.
The Jewish people have carried out “the solemn obligation to keep the memory of its martyrs alive in the conscience of the world.” The so-called civilized world, however, has internalized the methods and meaning of the Final Solution. As “The Black Book” observes approvingly, “Hitler and Nazism are now a constant presence in Western print and on Western television.”
Alas, although “their practices were comparable,” the “moral auras” of Nazism and Communism are still “antithetical.” “The Communist project” is permitted to claim “a commitment to universalistic and egalitarian goals, whereas the Nazi project” is said to offer only “unabashed national egoism.” The liberal world has refused to stigmatize Communism the way it has correctly evaluated Nazism. “The status of ex-Communist carries with it no stigma, even when unaccompanied by any expression of regret,” the Black Book observes:
Even more skewed is the situation in the East. No Gulag camps have been turned into museums to commemorate their inmates; all were bulldozed into the ground during Khrushchev’s de-Stalinization. The only memorial to Stalin’s victims is a modest stone brought to Moscow from the Arctic camp of Solovki and placed in Lubyanka Square (though well off to the side), where the KGB’s former headquarters still stands. Nor are there any regular visitors to this lonely slab (one must cross a stream of traffic to reach it) and no more than an occasional wilted bouquet. By contrast, Lenin’s statue still dominates most city centers, and his mummy reposes honorably in its Mausoleum. Throughout the former Communist world, moreover, virtually none of its responsible officials has been put on trial or punished. Indeed, everywhere Communist parties, though usually under new names, compete in politics.
The regime that was launched “in Sarajevo in 1914 and ended in Moscow in 1991” turned “mass crime into a full-blown system of government. . . . Crime [was] the defining characteristic of the Communist system throughout its existence.”
“Islamo-Nazis” or “Islamo-fascists” is how rightists have taken to dubbing the ISIS Islamists. But nothing beat the Communists when it came to the execution by “firing squads, hanging, drowning, battering, [even gassing and beheading], poisoning; the destruction of the population by starvation, through man-made famine, the withholding of food, or both; deportation, through which death can occur in transit (either through physical exhaustion or through confinement in an enclosed space), at one’s place of residence, or through forced labor (exhaustion, illness, hunger, cold),” all meticulously planned and documented by the central authorities.
Perpetuated by the Left and acquiesced to by a perpetually intimidated Right, the double standard adopted toward Communism is “scandalously out of line with the century’s real balance sheet of political crime.”
It must end!
On the week in which we commemorate the Holocaust, let us remember the forgotten victims of Communism who, too, were exterminated for who they were:
- USSR.: 20 million dead
- China: 65 million dead
- Vietnam: 1 million dead
- North Korea: 2 million dead
- Cambodia: 2 million dead
- Eastern Europe: 1 million dead
- Latin America: 150,000 dead
- Africa: 1.7 million dead
- Afghanistan: 1.5 million dead
- The international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power: about 10,000 dead
As Ilya Somin of The Volokh Conspiracy at the Washington Post suggests, a “Victims of Communism Day” is long overdue.
Ilana Mercer is a U.S.-based paleolibertarian writer. She pens WND’s longest-standing exclusive paleolibertarian column, “Return to Reason.” She is a contributor to Junge Freiheit, Germany’s finest weekly, and is a fellow at the Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies. Her latest book is “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons For America From Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Her website is www.IlanaMercer.com. She blogs at www.barelyablog.com.
Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/IlanaMercer, and “friend” her on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ilanamercer.libertarian.
I believe that the estimates of the victims of Communism are a bit low, but regardless, they more than warrant the outrage of everyone on the planet. A totalitarian by any other name is still an evil, murderous bastard. Brava, Ms. Mercer, for bringing the issue to the fore in this well written and informative piece.
Thomas, good point about the estimates of victims of Communism. I myself usually use R. J. Rummel’s numbers, as they seem to have credible assumptions behind them.